In a landmark 5-2 decision, the Michigan Supreme Court ruled that Michigan’s requirement of placing individuals convicted of nonsexual crimes on the sex offender registry is unconstitutional, deeming it as "cruel and unusual punishment." This ruling emerged following a case involving Michigander Cora Ladane Lymon, who was convicted of unlawfully imprisoning his family at gunpoint, leading to his inclusion on the registry.
The American Civil Liberties Union of Michigan had challenged Michigan's Sex Offenders Registration Act, citing nearly 300 cases of individuals on the registry for nonsexual offenses. The court found that the registry, originally intended for police use, failed to consider the nuances and impacts on individuals convicted of nonsexual crimes.
Lymon's case highlighted the severity of his actions, including torture and unlawful imprisonment, which led to his registration as a Tier 1 sex offender for 15 years. Despite upholding his conviction, the court ruled to remove him from the registry, emphasizing the absence of sexual elements in his crime and noting the lack of future risk of sex offenses.
The majority opinion raised concerns about the registry's efficacy in preventing recidivism, citing research on the adverse effects of notoriety, housing instability, and barriers to reintegration faced by individuals on the list. Justices Elizabeth Clement, Richard Bernstein, Megan Cavanagh, Elizabeth Welch, and Kyra Bolden highlighted the overreaching consequences faced by nonsexual offenders on the registry.
In stark contrast, Justice Brian Zahra dissented, arguing for the registry's importance in public safety and disregarding the majority's ruling as undermining the safety measures for Michigan families. Zahra contended that the registry served as a regulatory measure for public protection, aligning with policies in other states and at the federal level.
Comments